General Post Office respecting a claim by the Imperial Government against the Hongkong Post Office for £958.7.7.
The amount in question is, I am informed, made up of the following items, which Mr Barradale, the former Superintendent of the Money Order Office, whose defalcations formed the subject of my despatch No. 262 of the 30th ultimo, embezzled and consequently did not advise.
£304.8.1 on the 6th June, 1890.
£407.9.7 on the 11th July, 1890.
£218.9.11
These units, however, were subsequently advised to the Crown Agents on the following dates, viz:-
The third sum claimed is £346.9.1, but £218.9.11 was advised, as a sum of £28 had been over-advised in previous accounts.
I have the honour to be,
My...
General Post Office respecting
a
claim by the Imperial
Government against the
Hongkong Post Office for
£958.7.7.
مجھے
The
amount in
question is,
el
arr
informed,
made up of the following
which Mr Barrad as, the former
Superintendent of the Money
Order Office, whose defalcations
form
med the subject of my ~ despatch N. 262 of the 30the
altino, embezzled and
consequently
77770
consequently did not advise
153
These
avi vou
units, however,
subsequently advised to
the Crown A
dates viz:-
Agents
v
on the following
£304.8.1 on the 6th June, 1890.
£407.9.7
£218.9-11
"
11th July,
The third sum
oney
A
clained is £ 346.9.1/ but.
£ 2:18 · 9 · 11 was advised, as
of £28 had been over
advised in previous account!
I have the honour to be
My
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.